z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Philosophical and Evidentiary Basis of Homoeopathic Immunisation: a Response to Teixeira
Author(s) -
Isaac Golden
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of high dilution research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.129
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 1982-6206
DOI - 10.51910/ijhdr.v13i46.687
Subject(s) - homeopathy , medicine , scientific evidence , alternative medicine , family medicine , traditional medicine , epistemology , philosophy , pathology
Homeopathic immunisation was first used in 1798, but remains controversial with some homeopathic practitioners. Teixeira supported the use of genus epidemicus (GE) remedies, but strongly condemned the use of nosodes for disease prevention. However Teixeira failed to fully understand the Principal of Similars, he used a double standard when comparing evidence using GE remedies and nosodes, he misread information demonstrating the safety of long-term HP, and he appeared to be unaware of scientific evidence which is available supporting the prophylactic use of nosodes. These four areas are addressed in turn, and evidence from 1798 to 2012 is presented showing that appropriate homoeopathic immunisation using GE remedies and/or nosodes has the potential to prevent much suffering without any risk of possible short-term toxic damage or long-term energetic adverse effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here