Open AccessMoraalfilosofiese grondslae van die aksie vir pyn en lyding
Author(s) -
N J J Olivier
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
koers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.166
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2304-8557
pISSN - 0023-270X
DOI - 10.4102/koers.v55i1-4.1019
Subject(s) - restitution , damages , context (archaeology) , confession (law) , trace (psycholinguistics) , law , action (physics) , unjust enrichment , philosophy , theology , sociology , political science , history , archaeology , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics
It is generally accepted that the two major delictual actions derived from Roman law (the actio legis Aquiliae for patrimonial loss and the actio iniuriarum for sentimental damages in cases of libel) do not provide for the recovery of immaterial damages flowing from injury to the human body. This action for pain and suffering which forms part and panel of modem South African law has its roots in other legal systems. This article aims to trace its moral philosphical origins with reference to the views of Thomas of Aquino, authors of manuals used during confession and the sixteenth-century Spanish philosophers, as well as their influence on the important Roman-Dutch author, Hugo de Groot. In this context the role of restitution as instance ofiustitia commulativa is pivotal