Open Access
Outcome of patients undergoing posterior spine fixation and decompression for posttraumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures and the factors predicting it
Author(s) -
Geo Paul K. Jose,
Tinu Ravi Abraham,
P.K. Balakrishnan,
Muhammed P.S. Irphan,
T.P. Haris,
Vala Parth Prakashbhai
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
romanian neurosurgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2344-4959
pISSN - 1220-8841
DOI - 10.33962/roneuro-2021-077
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , decompression , visual analogue scale , lumbar
Background: Posterior spine fixation and decompression for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures have the advantage of stabilization of the fracture, decompression of neural canal, early mobilization and rehabilitation of the patient. The study aimed to find out the postoperative outcome and complications following posterior spine surgery and the factors affecting the outcome.
Methods: A retrospective study was carried out among 44 patients who underwent posterior spine decompression and fusion for thoracic and lumbar spine fracture. The data regarding patient presenting symptoms, comorbidity, associated injuries and imaging finding in CT and MRI were collected. The postoperative outcome of patients after surgery was assessed using ASIA impairment scale, KPS, VAS scale for pain are noted at the preoperative and postoperative period. Other factors like improvement of bowel and bladder symptoms, back stiffness and return to the job after surgery were also found out.
Results: There was a significant improvement in ASIA impairment scale (mean =0.74 grade), KPS score (mean = 40) and VAS pain scale (mean = 6.7) at 6 months follow up after surgery. Improvement in ASIA impairment scale was more in the patient with severe canal compromise (mean = 1.62 grade), patients with translational/ distraction injuries (mean= 1.01grade) and patients with paraparesis (mean=1.06). Only one-third of patients with bowel and bladder involvement improved after surgery. Around 56.8% of patients were able to return to jobs at 6 months follow up. Patients who were paraplegic at the initial presentation were mostly not able to return to jobs. The most common reported complication in the study was intraoperative pedicle breakage.
Conclusion: Decompression of the spinal cord plus posterior spine fixation is a safe, reliable and effective method in the management of thoracic and lumbar fractures with significant improvement in outcome in terms of motor power, pain and quality of life.