z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Wódz doskonały w świetle łacińskich panegiryków późnoantycznych
Author(s) -
Adrian Szopa
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
vox patrum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2719-3586
pISSN - 0860-9411
DOI - 10.31743/vp.3566
Subject(s) - panegyric , victory , ideal (ethics) , praise , object (grammar) , battle , philosophy , statue , literature , history , art , classics , law , epistemology , art history , ancient history , linguistics , poetry , political science , politics
In this article I am describing how Roman panegyric’s writers of Late Antiquity (XII Panegyrici Latini, Claudius Claudianus, Sidonius Apollinaris, Flavius Merobaudes, Priscian, Ennodius, Corippus and others) presented an im­age of the perfect general with reference to their object of praise. On the ground of detailed analysis of those features I am going to indicate the most expected ones according to the social reception. Moreover, I will point out those means which were used by the authors to create the image of the ideal general. Next, I will pay attention to how the authors change their way in presenting the perfect general and how this development was connected with the general evolution of the genre. Lastly, I will answer a quite perverse question: if the perfect general could lead his soldiers to a victory in a real battle. In the background there will be a continu­ous question, if the panegyric – despite its limitation – can or can’t be treated as a valuable historical source.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here