English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has excellent outcomes in the majority of patients. However, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most frequent and devastating complications. To minimize this risk, orthopaedic surgeons have implemented a host of prophylactic modalities including high flow ventilation systems, perioperative antibiotics, and intraoperative antiseptic agents, all with varying degrees of success.[1] Acute infections occurring within three months of surgery are of particular concern as these infections are believed to be acquired during the index procedure and may therefore be preventable.[2] In an effort to better address these early infections, orthopaedic surgeons have investigated the role of different types of wound dressing in the setting of TJA

orthopaedics and surgical sports medicine

DO DIFFERENT WOUND DRESSINGS AFTER TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?Do Different Wound Dressings After Total Joint Arthroplasty Make A Difference?