KRITIK TERHADAP PEMIKIRAN ABDULLAHI AHMED AN-NA’IM TENTANG KONSEP WARIS BAGI NON MUSLIM

This research will explain and classify the thoughts of Abdullah Ahmed an-Na'im, his thinking there are pros and cons, where he seeks to present the legal order based on Islamic norms and values ​​in contemporary life. This clearly shows Abdullah Ahmed an-Na'im's concern for the continued application of Islamic values ​​in the face of the demands of modernization. The study that becomes Abdullah Ahmed an-Na'im's concern is the issue of Shari'a versus Human Rights in terms of its epistemology. The thinking can be classified as a liberal study because the methodological framework used is like the general rules used by the secularists. Rational and scientific validity are used as measures to determine the truth and human values ​​are used as goals by ignoring the divine value. Even an-Na'im deny the role of the main sources of Islamic law, namely the Qur'an and Hadith. This can be seen clearly in his attitude which tends to ignore the important role of the Shari'a on human rights but on the other hand the role of secular law is considered to be so dominant and "great" in solving international human rights issues. Especially the case of non-Muslims in Islamic inheritance. The system of inheritance according to the Qur'an and the hadith and explained by the scholars in the classical books is final. Obeying the distribution of inheritance is a form of ta'abudi from a servant to his Rabb.