Open AccessJudicial Control of State Regulation in light of Jürgen Habermas’s thought: Analysis of the Decisions issued by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice on Long-Distance-like Calls within the same Municipality or between Conurbated Municipalities
Author(s) -
Marcus Flávio Horta Caldeira
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
revista de direito, estado e telecomunicações
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.188
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 1984-9729
pISSN - 1984-8161
DOI - 10.26512/lstr.v11i1.24859
Subject(s) - appeal , judicial review , economic justice , consistency (knowledge bases) , contradiction , law , agency (philosophy) , control (management) , state (computer science) , power (physics) , high court , administrative court , action (physics) , sociology , judicial opinion , political science , law and economics , economics , epistemology , computer science , management , social science , philosophy , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence
Purpose – This article seeks to examine the possibility and limits of judicial control of regulatory agencies decision-making power in Brazil based on the ideas of communicative action and integrity proposed by Jürgen Habermas.
Methodology/approach/design – There will be made an analysis of the decisions of the Superior Court of Justice regarding the charge of long-distance-like calls within the same municipality or between conurbated municipalities.
Findings – Superior Court of Justice, in most of its cases, privileges the technical criteria adopted by the regulatory agency, understanding that the judicial review would be an improper invasion of a “technical” area. However, there are decisions of the same Court that kept the judicial review carried out by the Courts of Appeal, in flagrant contradiction. The lack of a more consistent reasoning and, above all, of consistency among the decisions reveal the lack of attention on the part of the Brazilian Superior Court of the criteria of integrity advocated by Jürgen Habermas.