Comparing Two Motor Assessment Tools to Evaluate Neurobehavioral Intervention Effects in Infants With Very Low Birth Weight at 1 Year
Author(s) -
Janeline W.P. Van Hus,
Martine JeukensVisser,
Karen Koldewijn,
L. van Sonderen,
Joke H. Kok,
Frans Nollet,
Aleid G. van WassenaerLeemhuis
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
physical therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1538-6724
pISSN - 0031-9023
DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20120460
Subject(s) - bayley scales of infant development , psychomotor learning , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , motor skill , medicine , low birth weight , pediatrics , physical therapy , child development , psychology , cognition , psychiatry , pregnancy , biology , genetics , surgery
Infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) are at increased risk for motor deficits, which may be reduced by early intervention programs. For detection of motor deficits and to monitor intervention, different assessment tools are available. It is important to choose tools that are sensitive to evaluate the efficacy of intervention on motor outcome.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom