Open AccessBIOHISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT IN DROHOBYCH REGION IN 1930–1950s
Author(s) -
Назарій Капустинський
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
prolemi gumanìtarnih nauk: zbìrnik naukovih pracʹ drogobicʹkogo deržavnogo pedagogìčnogo unìversitetu ìmenì ìvana franka. serìâ ìstorìâ/problemi gumanìtarnih nauk. ìstorìâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-3715
pISSN - 2312-2595
DOI - 10.24919/2312-2595.5/47.217760
Subject(s) - ukrainian , historiography , liberation movement , epistemology , comparative historical research , narrative , diaspora , movement (music) , history , novelty , sociology , political science , social science , literature , law , gender studies , aesthetics , philosophy , art , linguistics , theology , politics
Summary. The purpose of this study is to analyze historiographical sources containing information about the leaders and prominent figures of the Ukrainian liberation movement of the 1930‒1950s in Drohobych region, to find out the extent of study of the problem, to highlight the unexplored and unexplored issues. Research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, systematic, scientific, verification, authorial objectivity, moderate narrative constructivism, as well as the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and special historical (historical-genetic, historical-typological, historical-systemic) methods. The scientific novelty is that for the first time the author analyzed historiographical literature on the leaders and prominent figures of the Ukrainian national liberation movement in Drohobych region of the 1930s and 1950s emphasizing the nature and problems of historical research, conceptual bases and informativity. Conclusions. The main outlines of the analyzed problem were depicted by the Ukrainian diaspora representatives and such attempts were made immediately after the Second World War. Modern researchers have not only deepened their predecessor but also expanded the range of scientific research. Now, the names of those who fought for Ukraine’s independence in the 1930’s and 1950’s have been forgotten. At the same time, there are problems that require further scientific research. In particular, it is necessary to find out the full composition of the OUN(b) Drohobych regional leadership and to trace the activity of this structure from the autumn of 1941 to the end of 1944. We have little information about its leading figures ‒ Andrey Shukatko, Vladimir Kobilnik, Levko Hrushak, Olga Nimilovich, Roman Kotsyub etc. It is hoped that further studies on the oral, social, gender history of the Ukrainian liberation movement will continue to gain in importance, as well as work on the creation of a modern commemorative canon.