Open Access
Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Biologi Di SMA Negeri
Author(s) -
Yohana Makaborang
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
kelola/kelola: jurnal manajemen pendidikan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2549-9661
pISSN - 2443-0544
DOI - 10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i2.p130-145
Subject(s) - curriculum , data collection , psychomotor learning , process (computing) , mathematics education , triangulation , computer science , psychology , cognition , pedagogy , mathematics , statistics , geometry , neuroscience , operating system
The study intends to evaluate the 2013 curriculum of biological subjects at SMAN 1 Waingapu. Evaluative research is a type of research. Data collection, data reduction, data display, and data conclusion are techniques in data analysis, while data collection techniques are conducted with document studies, observations, and interviews. The principal, Wakasek curriculum, biology teachers, and students are the subject of research. Legitimacy of data by using source triangulation and triangulation method. The evaluation of curriculum Implementation 2013 Biology subjects has been patting the Permendikbud No. 22 years 2016 on the standard of basic and secondary education process but still found gaps where: 1) on design planning in the preparation of materials/materials have not been sequential, analytical, related to the condition and actual; 2) on the Learning installation performance evaluation of biological teachers is already referring to the standards that are guided on the component aspects of planning, implementation, evaluation and no gaps; 3) The implementation process for the delivery of material has not been sequential, analytical, related to the condition and actual, as well as in preliminary activities, core activities and closing activities are not carried out optimally; 4) on learning outcomes have carried out an authentic assessment of the teaching learning process that is assessment Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor but the affective judgment only assesses prominent students. Recommendations need to be done to improve the design, process, and results so that in the implementation adjust the predefined standards.