A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study | Zendy

Greg Goodman | Zendy; Bekhor | Zendy;  Rich | Zendy; Rosén | Zendy; Michael Halstead | Zendy; C. Paul Rogers | Zendy

Open Access

A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study

Author(s) -

Greg Goodman,

Bekhor,

 Rich,

Rosén,

Michael Halstead,

C. Paul Rogers

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

clinical cosmetic and investigational dermatology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.73

H-Index - 35

ISSN - 1178-7015

DOI - 10.2147/ccid.s26055

Subject(s) - medicine , hyaluronic acid , longevity , randomized controlled trial , surgery , clinical trial , clinical endpoint , prospective cohort study , gerontology , anatomy

Commercially available hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers have distinct physicochemical properties related to their specific manufacturing technology, including HA concentration, cross-linking percentage, and particle size. These factors may determine treatment effectiveness, safety, and longevity; however, this requires confirmation in the clinic.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom

About

About Careers Publisher Partners Contact Us Our institutional solutions Get Organisational Trial or Quote

Learn

FAQs Blog Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Download the Zendy App

Discover

Explore

Home ZAIA Blog