z-logo
Premium
Use of the Laser Diffraction Method for Assessment of the Pipette Method
Author(s) -
Sochan Agata,
Bieganowski Andrzej,
Bartmiński Piotr,
Ryżak Magdalena,
Brzezińska Małgorzata,
Dębicki Ryszard,
Stuczyński Tomasz,
Polakowski Cezary
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2013.07.0308n
Subject(s) - pipette , soil water , suspension (topology) , stokes' law , standard deviation , particle size distribution , diffraction , particle (ecology) , particle size , sedimentation , sieve (category theory) , stokes number , soil test , analytical chemistry (journal) , materials science , mineralogy , soil science , chemistry , optics , chromatography , mathematics , stokes flow , environmental science , geology , physics , mechanics , statistics , sediment , geomorphology , reynolds number , oceanography , flow (mathematics) , homotopy , combinatorics , pure mathematics , turbulence
Particle‐size distribution (PSD) is one of the most important and frequently measured soil parameters. The assumptions inherent in the use of Stokes' law in the standardized sieve–sedimentation method (SSM) are known to introduce bias into the estimates of PSD. We used the laser diffraction method (LDM) to quantitatively estimate the bias in the SSM. Pipette samples collected at standardized times during the SSM of three different soils were analyzed with LDM to detect the largest particles in suspension. Light microscopy was used to verify the LDM estimates. Particle sizes in suspension were compared as a function of time to the predicted sizes by Stokes' law. Our findings suggest that (i) real sedimentation in a soil suspension deviated from Stokes' law in all the soils investigated; (ii) larger particles then predicted by Stokes' law occurred in all fractions of all investigated soils where counts of anomalously larger particles ranged from several to around 40%; (iii) the longer the time of the sedimentation, the larger the deviation from Stokes' law with the effect of irregularly shaped particles becoming more evident; and (iv) sieving soil samples appears to not be an effective method for the separation of the sand fraction from finer fractions. Our observations on the deviation from Stokes' law has previously been widely discussed in the literature. However, quantification of this phenomenon, as described in this paper, should help to better estimate the uncertainty of the pipette method.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom