z-logo
Premium
Soil‐Test N Recommendations Augmented with PEST‐Optimized RZWQM Simulations
Author(s) -
Malone R. W.,
Jaynes D. B.,
Ma L.,
Nolan B. T.,
Meek D. W.,
Karlen D. L.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2009.0425
Subject(s) - environmental science , dns root zone , tile drainage , watershed , hydrology (agriculture) , water quality , fertilizer , soil water , agronomy , soil science , ecology , biology , geotechnical engineering , machine learning , computer science , engineering
Improved understanding of year‐to‐year late‐spring soil nitrate test (LSNT) variability could help make it more attractive to producers. We test the ability of the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) to simulate watershed‐scale variability due to the LSNT, and we use the optimized model to simulate long‐term field N dynamics under related conditions. Autoregressive techniques and the automatic parameter calibration program PEST were used to show that RZWQM simulates significantly lower nitrate concentration in discharge from LSNT treatments compared with areas receiving fall N fertilizer applications within the tile‐drained Walnut Creek, Iowa, watershed (>5 mg N L −1 difference for the third year of the treatment, 1999). This result is similar to field‐measured data from a paired watershed experiment. A statistical model we developed using RZWQM simulations from 1970 to 2005 shows that early‐season precipitation and early‐season temperature account for 90% of the interannual variation in LSNT‐based fertilizer N rates. Long‐term simulations with similar average N application rates for corn ( Zea mays L.) (151 kg N ha −1 ) show annual average N loss in tile flow of 20.4, 22.2, and 27.3 kg N ha −1 for LSNT, single spring, and single fall N applications. These results suggest that (i) RZWQM is a promising tool to accurately estimate the water quality effects of LSNT; (ii) the majority of N loss difference between LSNT and fall applications is because more N remains in the root zone for crop uptake; and (iii) year‐to‐year LSNT‐based N rate differences are mainly due to variation in early‐season precipitation and temperature.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom