Surface Seals Reduce 1,3‐Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin Emissions in Field Tests

Reducing emissions is essential for minimizing the impact of soil fumigation on the environment. Water application to the soil surface (or water seal) has been demonstrated to reduce 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D) emissions in soil column tests. This study determined the effectiveness of water application to reduce emissions of 1,3‐D and chloropicrin (CP) in comparison to other surface seals under field conditions. In a small‐plot field trial on a Hanford sandy loam soil (coarse‐loamy, mixed, superactive, nonacid, thermic Typic Xerorthents) in the San Joaquin Valley, CA. Telone C35 (61% 1,3‐D and 35% CP) was shank‐applied at a depth of 46 cm at a rate of 610 kg ha −1 Soil surface seal treatments included control (no tarp and no water application), standard high density polyethylene (HDPE) tarp over dry and pre‐irrigated soil, virtually impermeable film (VIF) tarp, initial water application by sprinklers immediately following fumigation, and intermittent water applications after fumigation. The atmospheric emissions and gas‐phase distribution of fumigants in soil profile were monitored for 9 d. Among the surface seals, VIF and HDPE tarp over dry soil resulted in the lowest and the highest total emission losses, respectively. Intermittent water applications reduced 1,3‐D and CP emissions significantly more than HDPE tarp alone. The initial water application also reduced emission peak and delayed emission time. Pre‐irrigated soil plus HDPE tarp reduced fumigant emissions similarly as the intermittent water applications and also yielded the highest surface soil temperature, which may improve overall soil pest control.