Open AccessKEDUDUKAN ORGANISASI ADVOKAT SEBAGAI WADAH TUNGGAL PROFESI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
Author(s) -
Muhammad Fajar Sidiq Widodo,
Sudarsono Sudarsono,
Bambang Winarno
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jurnal ilmiah pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2527-8495
pISSN - 2528-0767
DOI - 10.17977/um019v3i2p149-158
Subject(s) - constitutional court , paragraph , oath , normative , legislature , law , political science , state (computer science) , mathematics , constitution , algorithm
Advocate is a free and independent profession. According to the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU–XIII/2015. It is interesting that the decision has decided the issue of oath in Article 4 Paragraph (1) Advocate Law, but affects Article 28 Paragraph (1) concerning Advocates Organization. This research is a normative research that uses conceptual approach and legislative approach, which hopefully can dig up and find out the position of Advo- cates Organizations after the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU– XIII/2015. It is known from the research that the Constitutional Court is unauthorized to decide which organization is legitimate, although Advocates Organization can also be named as state institution.