z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Resilience capacities assessment for critical infrastructures disruption: READ pilot applications (part 2)
Author(s) -
Boris Petrenj,
Paolo Trucco,
C. Di Mauro
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international journal of critical infrastructures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.195
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1741-8038
pISSN - 1475-3219
DOI - 10.1504/ijcis.2018.10015605
Subject(s) - resilience (materials science) , interdependence , context (archaeology) , critical infrastructure , critical infrastructure protection , process management , maturity (psychological) , risk analysis (engineering) , computer science , business , environmental resource management , engineering , computer security , geography , political science , environmental science , physics , thermodynamics , archaeology , law
The study aims at supporting the stakeholders involved in the Emergency Management (EM) activities to tackle the challenges related to scenarios involving interdependent Critical Infrastructure (CI) systems, by building resilience. Our approach to enhancing resilience is capabilities based, which supports the identification, assessment and development of specific capabilities required to prepare to, cope with and recover from CI disruptions within the EM set-up. The primary objective is to enable and foster collaborative EM in the context of Public-Private Collaborations (e.g. interdependent, multi-sectoral, and multi-stakeholder) for CI resilience. The READ framework and related tool has been tested to support the stakeholders involved in EM and post-stress activities, including CI operators, to assess their own resilience capacities with respect to cross-border disruptions and thus identify the main areas where progress is needed. Two pilot cases were used to validate the READ framework and tool, and to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the context of regional Public-Private Collaborations for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Resilience with different degree of development and level of maturity, namely Basque Country (Spain) and Lombardy Region (Italy). The practitioners’ feedback from both application cases confirmed the usefulness of such approach and helped to identify areas for future research and improvement.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom