z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Archaeological Culture and Structure of Archaeological Science
Author(s) -
A. Faifert
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
teoriâ i praktika arheologičeskih issledovanij
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2712-8202
pISSN - 2307-2539
DOI - 10.14258/tpai(2022)34(1).-01
Subject(s) - identification (biology) , archaeology , desk , history , archaeological theory , field (mathematics) , class (philosophy) , archaeological record , sociology , computer science , epistemology , philosophy , mathematics , biology , pure mathematics , operating system , botany
The article gives a definition of archaeological culture, which assumed to become consensual. There are three main approaches to the identification of archaeological cultures: typological, territorial-chronological and sociological. Each one individually has irremediable disadvantages. The article substantiates the need for a separate consideration of the archaeological cultures of the primitive era and the cultures of early class societies. A scheme is proposed in which these approaches become consistent procedures within the analytical methodology of archaeology. A description is given to the phratrial model of cultural genesis explaining the change of archaeological cultures. The article proposes a criterion for the sufficiency of sources for the identification of archaeological culture - the manifestation of a system of self-identification through typological analysis. The scheme also allows you to determine the ratio of the terms technocomplex, group of monuments, archaeological culture, etc. On the basis of the above theoretical constructions, the structure of archaeological science consisting of field, desk, theoretical sciences and the history of primitive society is build. The separation of methodological and theoretical branches of science is substantiated.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here