Open AccessMocroevolution, minimalism, and the paleobiological revolution
Author(s) -
Dániel Bárdos
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
különbség
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2560-158X
pISSN - 1785-7821
DOI - 10.14232/kulonbseg.2016.16.1.200
Subject(s) - punctuated equilibrium , paleobiology , evolutionary theory , epistemology , macroevolution , minimalism (technical communication) , context (archaeology) , skepticism , scope (computer science) , modern evolutionary synthesis , evolutionism , darwin (adl) , evolutionary biology , philosophy , biology , computer science , paleontology , phylogenetics , biochemistry , software engineering , human–computer interaction , gene , programming language
It is a basic question of evolutionary theory what sort of connections there are between microevolutionary and macroevolutionary processes, i. e. between changes below the level of species in the present and changes above the level of a given species in the long run. The paper argues that this question about the structure of evolutionary theory cannot be answered just by comparing arguments by modern synthesis theory on the one hand and those of paleobiology on the other. Modern synthesis theory remains sceptical of the use of microevolutionary mechanisms, while paleobiology maintains their importance. The paper claim that the question can only be answered within the context of the history of science that has been shaping it since the publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species. So the question about the use of microevolutionary mechanisms should be considered to be a struggle about the scope of evolutionary science and its methodologies rather than a scientific question about the reducibility of macroevolution.