Open Access
East Slobozhansk names of utensils and kitchen utensils: a dynamic aspect
Author(s) -
Maryna Voloshynova
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
lìngvìstika
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2227-2631
DOI - 10.12958/2227-2631-2020-1-42-4-15
Subject(s) - lexicon , linguistics , lexical semantics , nominative case , semantics (computer science) , computer science , vocabulary , lexical item , part of speech , function (biology) , lexicographical order , variation (astronomy) , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , mathematics , programming language , philosophy , physics , evolutionary biology , astrophysics , biology , verb , combinatorics
In the article, based on the actual material of recorded 61 dialects of the Luhansk region, it has been conducted a lexical and semantic study of the Easten Slobodian names of crockery and kitchen utensils. During the exploration the functional activity of the identified representatives has been established. The comparative analysis of the recorded names with the lexical material of other dialect continuums of the Ukrainian language has been carried out that’s made it possible to track the parallel names with different phonetic design, the nomens with the different, identical or similar semantics. In the light of the definition of the dynamic trends it has been stated that the lexical units can show constancy in two chronological sections which is manifested in the immutability of semantics over the course of the whole century. It has also been observed the updating of the lexicon associated with the increase in the nominative series on the modern chronological cross-section that occurred due to the presence of the grammatical and word-forming variants of lexemes, the expansion of the semantic structure of some nomens that simultaneously function as the representatives of several semes. Sometimes the vocabulary demonstrates the process of gradual archaization as far as the nomens available in the register of the ancient lexicographic work are absent both in the dialects under the consideration and in the dialects of other dialects.