English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Renal arterial embolization (RAE) is considered to be a safe and effective method for treating a variety of renal lesions and pathology. It is the optimal method not only to stop bleeding, but to preserve renal parenchyma and renal function. Patients who are scheduled to RAE who showed negative catheter angiography with the procedure subsequently denied have a special concern because they are subjected to unnecessary procedure with its complications and didn’t get its benefits. This circumstance is infrequently reported in the literature, and that compelled us to identify the predictors of negative renal angiography findings that would result in a failure to undertake RAE. Results The study included 180 patients (126 males; 70%) with a mean ± SD age of 44 ± 14 years. Iatrogenic causes were the most common indication for RAE (108 of 180; 60%), while spontaneous unknown reasons constituted (17 of 180 patients; 9%). Angiography showed various lesions in 148 patients: pseudoaneurysm (80 of 148; 54%), tumours (28 of 148; 19%), arteriovenous (AV) fistulas (22 of 148; 15%) and both pseudoaneurysm and AV fistulas (18 of 148; 12%). However, in the remaining 32 of 180 patients (18%) no lesions were identified on renal angiography and RAE procedures were not undertaken. On bivariate analysis, neither gender, side of the lesions, haematuria prior to RAE, or renal artery anatomy were predictors for negative angiography. However, the indication for RAE (spontaneous unknown reasons) of renal haemorrhage was the only predictor for negative angiography (9/17 (53%),  P  = 0.001). Conclusion Patients scheduled for RAE may show negative findings with no lesions on renal angiography. Among the different indications for RAE, patients with spontaneous (unknown) have the highest probability (53%) of being associated with negative renal angiography findings, however, those with renal tumours and post-traumatic causes have a low probability. In those patients with spontaneous (unknown), conservative management should be the initial treatment of choice in order to avoid unnecessary RAE and its associated complications.

the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine /the egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Negative renal angiography with subsequent denied angioembolization: findings in a series of 180 patients at a tertiary interventional uroradiology unit