English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Blaming the World Health Organization ( who ) for its failures in the Ebola crisis was a common reaction of the media. However, exclusively denouncing the  who  for the spread of Ebola falls short as it does not recognize the structural deficits of those recent governance procedures financing global health that lead to a chronic underfunding of the  who . Against this background, the article reflects perspectives of a democratic reform of global health funding. It concludes that only the  who  can provide a leadership on global health matters, but to do so it depends on states willing to rebuild the  who ’s capacities to act. To address the global health crisis properly, the revitalization of  who ’s constitutional mandate is critically necessary. The discussion is based on normative legal theory, which argues that processes of globalization have transformed international law into a global rule of law, placing specific duties on states and international institutions.

The World Health Organization in Crisis—Lessons to be Learned Beyond the Ebola Outbreak