Open AccessEarly Experience With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Val David,
FerreiraNeto Alfredo Nunes,
WintzerWehekind Jerome,
Dagenais François,
Paradis JeanMichel,
Bernier Mathieu,
O'Connor Kim,
Beaudoin Jonathan,
FreitasFerraz Afonso B.,
RodésCabau Josep
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.119.013332
Subject(s) - medicine , mitral regurgitation , mitral valve replacement , cardiology , etiology , mitral valve , surgery
Background Transcatheter mitral valve replacement ( TMVR ) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation in patients with prohibitive or high surgical risk. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical procedural characteristics and outcomes associated with the early TMVR experience. Methods and Results Published studies and international conference presentations reporting data on TMVR systems were identified. Only records including clinical characteristics, procedural results, and 30‐day and midterm outcomes were analyzed. A total of 16 publications describing 308 patients were analyzed. Most patients (65.9%) were men, with a mean age of 75 years (range: 69–81 years) and Society for Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality score of 7.7% (range: 6.1–8.6%). The etiology of mitral regurgitation was predominantly secondary or mixed (87.1%), and 81.5% of the patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV . A transapical approach was used in 81.5% of patients, and overall technical success was high (91.7%). Postprocedural mean transmitral gradient was 3.5 mm Hg (range: 3–5.5 mm Hg), and only 4 cases (1.5%) presented residual moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. Procedural and all‐cause 30‐day mortality were 4.6% and 13.6%, respectively. Left ventricular outflow obstruction and conversion to open heart surgery were reported in 0.3% and 4% of patients, respectively. All‐cause and cardiovascular‐related mortality rates were 27.6% and 23.3%, respectively, after a mean follow‐up of 10 (range: 3 to 24) months. Conclusions TMVR was a feasible, less invasive alternative for treating severe mitral regurgitation in patients with high or prohibitive surgical risk. TMVR was associated with a high rate of successful valve implantation and excellent hemodynamic results. However, periprocedural complications and all‐cause mortality were relatively high.