English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The measurement of antibody to Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide is important in the study of natural immunity and in the immunogenicity evaluation of H. influenzae type b vaccines. Several radioantigen binding assays (RABA) have been developed to measure H. influenzae type b anticapsular antibody, but recent immunogenicity data obtained with structurally similar vaccines suggest major differences in antibody quantitation in different laboratories. To evaluate interlaboratory variability in the measurement of anticapsular antibody levels, we blindly evaluated a sample of 40 pre- and postimmunization sera by eight RABAs in different laboratories. Evaluation of RABA methods revealed differences in polysaccharide antigens, radiolabeling methods, concentration and volume of antigen and antibody, and other assay methods. The reported results of assays varied significantly between laboratories (up to sixfold differences in geometric means), in part because of differences in assay sensitivity and different proportions of samples having undetectable levels of antibody (0 to 65% of specimens with undetectable levels). After standardizing the limit of sensitivity for all assays (0.125 microgram/ml), the results of all combinations of paired analyses of RABA assays correlated well (r = 0.88 to 0.99) but the geometric mean levels still varied as much as twofold. For individual sera, the differences between paired assays often were substantial (P less than or equal to 0.0001, paired t test), with some results varying as much as 64-fold. Differences were greatest for lower levels of antibody. There was good comparability and interlaboratory reproducibility of some assays but not of others. Intrinsic or extrinsic labeling of the antigen was not a major determinant of comparability. In most instances, the current variation in the quantitation of antibody levels by these assays precludes interassay comparisons. A standardized measurement of antibody needs to be developed to adequately compare results between different H. influenzae type b immunogenicity studies.

Variable quantitation of Haemophilus influenzae type b anticapsular antibody by radioantigen binding assay