Premium
The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): A Completed Reference Database of Lung Nodules on CT Scans
Author(s) -
Armato Samuel G.,
McLennan Geoffrey,
Bidaut Luc,
McNittGray Michael F.,
Meyer Charles R.,
Reeves Anthony P.,
Zhao Binsheng,
Aberle Denise R.,
Henschke Claudia I.,
Hoffman Eric A.,
Kazerooni Ella A.,
MacMahon Heber,
Beek Edwin J. R.,
Yankelevitz David,
Biancardi Alberto M.,
Bland Peyton H.,
Brown Matthew S.,
Engelmann Roger M.,
Laderach Gary E.,
Max Daniel,
Pais Richard C.,
Qing David P.Y.,
Roberts Rachael Y.,
Smith Amanda R.,
Starkey Adam,
Batra Poonam,
Caligiuri Philip,
Farooqi Ali,
Gladish Gregory W.,
Jude C. Matilda,
Munden Reginald F.,
Petkovska Iva,
Quint Leslie E.,
Schwartz Lawrence H.,
Sundaram Baskaran,
Dodd Lori E.,
Fenimore Charles,
Gur David,
Petrick Nicholas,
Freymann John,
Kirby Justin,
Hughes Brian,
Vande Casteele Alessi,
Gupte Sangeeta,
Sallam Maha,
Heath Michael D.,
Kuhn Michael H.,
Dharaiya Ekta,
Burns Richard,
Fryd David S.,
Salganicoff Marcos,
Anand Vikram,
Shreter Uri,
Vastagh Stephen,
Croft Barbara Y.,
Clarke Laurence P.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3528204
Subject(s) - database , medicine , radiology , medical physics , information retrieval , computer science
Purpose: The development of computer‐aided diagnostic (CAD) methods for lung nodule detection, classification, and quantitative assessment can be facilitated through a well‐characterized repository of computed tomography (CT) scans. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI) completed such a database, establishing a publicly available reference for the medical imaging research community. Initiated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), further advanced by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and accompanied by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through active participation, this public‐private partnership demonstrates the success of a consortium founded on a consensus‐based process. Methods: Seven academic centers and eight medical imaging companies collaborated to identify, address, and resolve challenging organizational, technical, and clinical issues to provide a solid foundation for a robust database. The LIDC/IDRI Database contains 1018 cases, each of which includes images from a clinical thoracic CT scan and an associated XML file that records the results of a two‐phase image annotation process performed by four experienced thoracic radiologists. In the initial blinded‐read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed each CT scan and marked lesions belonging to one of three categories (“ nodule ≥ 3 mm ,” “ nodule < 3 mm ,” and “non‐ nodule ≥ 3 mm ”). In the subsequent unblinded‐read phase, each radiologist independently reviewed their own marks along with the anonymized marks of the three other radiologists to render a final opinion. The goal of this process was to identify as completely as possible all lung nodules in each CT scan without requiring forced consensus. Results: The Database contains 7371 lesions marked “nodule” by at least one radiologist. 2669 of these lesions were marked “ nodule ≥ 3 mm ” by at least one radiologist, of which 928 (34.7%) received such marks from all four radiologists. These 2669 lesions include nodule outlines and subjective nodule characteristic ratings. Conclusions: The LIDC/IDRI Database is expected to provide an essential medical imaging research resource to spur CAD development, validation, and dissemination in clinical practice.