Open AccessToward a conditional approach to anonymity? An explorative multicenter longitudinal study among anonymous living kidney donors and recipients
Author(s) -
Pronk Mathilde C.,
Slaats Dorthe,
Pant Karlijn A. M. I.,
Vervelde Janneke,
Dooper Ine M.,
Dor Frank J. M. F.,
Weimar Willem,
Wetering Jacqueline,
Zuidema Willij C.,
Massey Emma K.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
transplant international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1432-2277
pISSN - 0934-0874
DOI - 10.1111/tri.13016
Subject(s) - anonymity , medicine , donation , family medicine , kidney donation , kidney transplantation , transplantation , surgery , computer security , political science , computer science , law
Summary Anonymity between living donors and recipients is a topic of discussion among transplant professionals. This longitudinal study explored living kidney donors’ and patients’ perspectives on anonymity. Prior to surgery (T0) and 3 months afterward (T1), participants in unspecified or specified indirect donation programs completed a questionnaire on their experiences with and attitudes toward anonymity as well as demographic and medical characteristics. Nonparametric tests were used to assess group differences and associations. Participants were content with anonymity at T0 and T1. Fourteen and 23% wanted to meet at T0 and T1, respectively. If the other party expressed the wish to meet, 50% (T0) and 55% (T1) would be willing to meet. Most participants agreed that meeting should be allowed if both parties agree. Attitude toward anonymity did not differ between donors/recipients, nor between T0/T1 and unspecified/specified indirect donation programs. This study showed that most donors and recipients who participated in anonymous donation schemes are in favor of a conditional approach to anonymity. Guidelines on how to revoke anonymity if both parties agree are needed and should include education about pros and cons of (non‐) anonymity and a logistical plan on how, when, where, and by whom anonymity should be revoked.