Premium
Feasibility of Contralateral Oblique Fluoroscopy‐guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections
Author(s) -
Park Chan Hong,
Lee Sang Ho
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pain practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1533-2500
pISSN - 1530-7085
DOI - 10.1111/papr.12341
Subject(s) - fluoroscopy , medicine , radicular pain , epidural steroid injection , radiology , nuclear medicine , surgery , lumbar , low back pain , alternative medicine , pathology
Background Cervical epidural steroid injection ( CESI ), given in conjunction with local anesthetics, is a common remedy for cervical radicular pain and is generally performed under c‐arm fluoroscopic guidance, computed tomography ( CT ), or ultrasound. Interlaminar procedures, such as CESI , typically rely on anteroposterior and lateral ( APL ) views during needle placement. However, lateral views may be obscured by body habitus in certain individuals. Swimmer's view or contralateral oblique ( CLO ) view may be used to avoid this. Objective Our intent was to assess technical success and procedural risk in patients subjected to image‐guided CESI procedures with CLO c‐arm fluoroscopy. Methods A total of 186 of patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups undergoing image‐guided CESI via (1) CT , (2) c‐arm fluoroscopy CLO , and (3) c‐arm fluoroscopy APL . Complication rates and technical success were assessed, basing the latter on image reviews to confirm the presence of epidural contrast. Results All image‐guided CESI procedures utilizing CT and CLO fluoroscopy proved technically successful. In the CT group, epidural needle tip and contrast dispersion were clearly visible at all levels of study. In the CLO subset, needle tip visibility was unclear in isolated instances at levels C6‐7 and C7‐T1 (1 patient each level). In APL procedures, needle tip was regularly obscured by shoulder anatomy at levels C6‐7 (26 of 41 patients) and C7‐T1 (15 of 16 patients), and contrast dispersion was often uncertain. Conclusion CLO fluoroscopy‐guided CESI is feasible and safe, comparing favorably with CT ‐guided CESI .
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom