Premium
A Practical Method for Accurate Measurement of Trace Level Fluorine in Mg‐ and Fe‐Bearing Minerals and Glasses Using Electron Probe Microanalysis
Author(s) -
Zhang Chao,
Koepke Jürgen,
Wang LianXun,
Wolff Paul E.,
Wilke Sören,
Stechern André,
Almeev Renat,
Holtz Francois
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
geostandards and geoanalytical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.037
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 1639-4488
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00390.x
Subject(s) - analytical chemistry (journal) , mineralogy , microanalysis , chemistry , fluorine , silicate , electron microprobe , organic chemistry , chromatography
Fluorine plays an important role in magmatic and hydrothermal processes, but due to its low abundance in geological samples determining F is difficult by electron probe microanalysis. By using a W‐Si multi‐layered pseudocrystal as the diffraction crystal instead of thallium acid phthalate ( TAP ), count rates were considerably higher, which however introduced spectral interferences between F K α and Fe L α and Mg K β lines when normal integral mode is applied. In this study, we developed a protocol using a W‐Si multi‐layered pseudocrystal for measuring accurately trace level F in both minerals and glasses. First, we used differential mode with an optimised PHA (pulse height analysis) setting in signal processing, instead of normal integral mode, which completely eliminated the second‐order Mg K β line. Second, the overlap of the first‐order Fe L α on F K α peak, which cannot be filtered by modifying the PHA setting, was calibrated quantitatively using F‐free minerals and silicate glasses. Applying this two‐step method, F was determined in a number of reference glasses, as well as in glasses synthesised from powders of the rock reference materials AC ‐E, GS ‐N and DR ‐N. Our data are consistent within error with F concentrations determined by other methods, demonstrating the reliability of this method.