z-logo
Premium
Multi‐Element Isotope Dilution Sector Field ICP‐MS: A Precise Technique for the Analysis of Geological Materials and its Application to Geological Reference Materials
Author(s) -
Willbold Matthias,
Jochum Klaus Peter
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
geostandards and geoanalytical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.037
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 1639-4488
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2005.tb00656.x
Subject(s) - isotope dilution , inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , trace element , matrix (chemical analysis) , analytical chemistry (journal) , isotope , mineralogy , sample preparation , nist , chemistry , mass spectrometry , geology , physics , environmental chemistry , chromatography , geochemistry , computer science , quantum mechanics , natural language processing
We present a multi‐element technique for the simultaneous determination of twelve trace elements in geological materials by combined isotope dilution (ID) sector field inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (SF‐ICP‐MS) following simple sample digestion. In addition, the concentrations of fourteen other trace elements have been obtained using the ID determined elements as internal standards. This method combines the advantages of ID (high precision and accuracy) with those of SF‐ICP‐MS (multi‐element capability, fast sample processing without element separation) and overcomes the most prevailing drawbacks of ICP‐MS (matrix effects and drift in sensitivity). Trace element concentration data for BHVO‐1 (n = 5) reproduced to within 1–3% RSD with an accuracy of 1–2% relative to respective literature values for ID values and 2–3% for all other values. We have applied this technique to the analysis of seventeen geological reference materials from the USGS, GSJ and IAG. The sample set also included the new USGS reference glasses BCR‐2G, BHVO‐2G and BIR‐1G, as well as the MPI‐DING reference glasses KL2‐G and ML3B‐G, and NIST SRM 612. Most data agreed within 3–4% with respective literature data. The concentration data for the USGS reference glasses agreed in most cases with respective data of the original rock powder within the combined standard uncertainty of the method (2–3%), except the U concentration of BIR‐1G, which showed a three times higher concentration compared to BIR‐1.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom