z-logo
Premium
Reliability of Blood Pressure Parameters for Dry Weight Estimation in Hemodialysis Patients
Author(s) -
Susantitaphong Paweena,
Laowaloet Suthanit,
Tiranathanagul Khajohn,
Chulakadabba Adhisabandh,
Katavetin Pisut,
Praditpornsilpa Kearkiat,
Tungsanga Kriang,
EiamOng Somchai
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
therapeutic apheresis and dialysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.415
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1744-9987
pISSN - 1744-9979
DOI - 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01136.x
Subject(s) - medicine , blood pressure , body water , hemodialysis , pulse pressure , extracellular fluid , dialysis , cardiology , body mass index , mean blood pressure , mean arterial pressure , body weight , heart rate , extracellular , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Chronic volume overload resulting from interdialytic weight gain and inadequate fluid removal plays a significant role in poorly controlled high blood pressure. Although bioimpedance has been introduced as an accurate method for assessing hydration status, the instrument is not available in general hemodialysis (HEMO) centers. This study was conducted to explore the correlation between hydration status measured by bioimpedance and blood pressure parameters in chronic HEMO patients. Multifrequency bioimpedance analysis was used to determine pre‐ and post‐dialysis hydration status in 32 stable HEMO patients. Extracellular water/total body water (ECW/TBW) determined by sum of segments from bioimpedance analysis was used as an index of hydration status. The mean age was 57.9 ± 16.4 years. The mean dry weight and body mass index were 57.7 ± 14.5 kg and 22.3 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 , respectively. Pre‐dialysis ECW/TBW was significantly correlated with only pulse pressure (r = 0.5, P  = 0.003) whereas post‐dialysis ECW/TBW had significant correlations with pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.6, P  = 0.001, r = 0.4, P  = 0.04, r = −0.4, and P  = 0.02, respectively). After dialysis, the mean values of ECW/TBW, systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure were significantly decreased. ECW/TBW was used to classify the patients into normohydration (≤0.4) and overhydration (>0.4) groups. Systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure significantly reduced after dialysis in the normohydration group but did not significantly change in the overhydration group. Pre‐dialysis pulse pressure, post‐dialysis pulse pressure, and post‐dialysis systolic blood pressure in the overhydration group were significantly higher than normohydration group. Due to the simplicity and cost, blood pressure parameters, especially pulse pressure, might be a simple reference for clinicians to determine hydration status in HEMO patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom