z-logo
Premium
Positive Cross‐Match Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Longer‐Term Outcomes
Author(s) -
Haririan A.,
Nogueira J.,
Kukuruga D.,
Schweitzer E.,
Hess J.,
GurkTurner C.,
Jacobs S.,
Drachenberg C.,
Bartlett S.,
Cooper M.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
american journal of transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.89
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1600-6143
pISSN - 1600-6135
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02524.x
Subject(s) - medicine , panel reactive antibody , thymoglobulin , surgery , kidney transplantation , creatinine , transplantation , retrospective cohort study , kidney , cohort , single center
The long‐term graft outcomes after positive cross‐match (PXM) living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) are unknown and the descriptive published data present short‐medium term results. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of LDKT with PXM by flow cytometry performed at our center during February 1999 to October 2006, compared to a control group, matched 1:1 for age, sex, race, retransplantation and transplant year. The PXM group was treated with a course of plasmapheresis/low‐dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preoperatively, and OKT3 or thymoglobulin induction.Both groups (n = 41 each) were comparable except for duration of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD), induction, HLA mismatch and panel‐reactive antibody (PRA). During the period of up to 9 years, 14 PXM and 7 controls lost their grafts (p < 0.04). Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 89.9% and 69.4% for PXM group and 97.6% and 80.6% for the controls, respectively. PXM was associated with higher risk of graft loss (HR 2.6, p = 0.04; 95%CI 1.03–6.4) (t 1/2 = 6.8 years), but not with patient survival (HR 1.96, p = 0.29; 95%CI 0.6–7.0) or 1‐year serum creatinine (β= 0.06, p = 0.59 for ln (SCr); 95% CI −0.16 to 0.28).These results suggest that despite the favorable short‐term results of PXM LDKT after PP/IVIg conditioning, medium‐long‐term outcomes are notably worse than expected, perhaps comparable to non‐ECD deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here