Premium
Self‐assessment of dental conditions: validity of a questionnaire
Author(s) -
Palmqvist Sigvard,
Söderfeldt Björn,
Arnbjerg Dorte
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.061
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1600-0528
pISSN - 0301-5661
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00160.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dentures , dentistry , cohen's kappa , kappa , physical examination , maxilla , clinical judgment , orthodontics , medical physics , statistics , linguistics , philosophy , mathematics
In order to determine (he validity of dental data obtained from a questionnaire. 100 subjects randomly selected from 2383 respondents were examined clinically. The quality of dental status was ordered in lour groups for the number of mission and replaced teeth and for denture stains. For the number of missing and replaced teeth, the observed agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the questionnaire answers was 65% for both the maxilla and the mandible, and the agreement estimated by Kappa was 0.52. However, the disagreement was not randomly distributed, since reporting of better dental status than the actual one was much more common than reporting of poorer stains. Regarding denture status, the agreement between self‐assessment and clinical diagnosis was good; all removable dentures in situ at the clinical examination were reported by the subjects as some kind of denture, although not always the correct type. The results of the study indicate that the use of self‐assessment might be reasonable when measuring denture status, and (hat self‐assessment of the number of missing and replaced teeth is a biased estimate of the clinical diagnosis. Thus appropriate action should he taken when using (his type of data.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom