Premium
Monitoring Reading Growth: Goal Setting, Measurement Frequency, and Methods of Evaluation
Author(s) -
Jenkins Joseph,
Terjeson Kari J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
learning disabilities research and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.018
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1540-5826
pISSN - 0938-8982
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00322.x
Subject(s) - reading (process) , psychology , curriculum based measurement , curriculum , goal setting , multiple baseline design , special education , mathematics education , pedagogy , curriculum development , social psychology , intervention (counseling) , political science , law , curriculum mapping , psychiatry
This study examined effects of goal setting, frequency of progress monitoring, and method of evaluating progress on the number of instructional change prompts generated by reading‐curriculum‐based measurements (CBM). Participants were 31 high‐incidence special education students in grades 2–6 selected from 8 schools. Following baseline measurements, researchers administered grade‐level CBM passages every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Comparisons included 3 goal levels (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 word growth per week), 3 monitoring/evaluation schedules (every 2, 4, or 8 weeks), and 2 methods for evaluating progress (points below the aim line or slope). Overall, more ambitious goals, less frequent monitoring, and using slope to evaluate progress generated more instructional change prompts. Results favored less frequent monitoring and using slope to evaluate progress.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom