Premium
Confocal Examination of Subsurface Cracking in Ceramic Materials
Author(s) -
Etman Maged K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00447.x
Subject(s) - materials science , ceramic , scanning electron microscope , microstructure , composite material , cracking , enamel paint , confocal laser scanning microscopy , confocal , biomedical engineering , optics , medicine , physics
Abstract Purpose: The original ceramic surface finish and its microstructure may have an effect on crack propagation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between crack propagation and ceramic microstructure following cyclic fatigue loading, and to qualitatively evaluate and quantitatively measure the surface and subsurface crack depths of three types of ceramic restorations with different microstructures using a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Materials and Methods: Twenty (8 × 4 × 2 mm 3 ) blocks of AllCeram (AC), experimental ceramic (EC, IPS e.max Press), and Sensation SL (SSL) were prepared, ten glazed and ten polished of each material. Sixty antagonist enamel specimens were made from the labial surfaces of permanent incisors. The ceramic abraders were attached to a wear machine, so that each enamel specimen presented at 45 degrees to the vertical movement of the abraders, and immersed in artificial saliva. Wear was induced for 80K cycles at 60 cycles/min with a load of 40 N and 2‐mm horizontal deflection. The specimens were examined for cracks at baseline, 5K, 10K, 20K, 40K, and 80K cycles. Results: Twenty‐ to 30‐μm deep subsurface cracking appeared in SSL, with 8 to 10 μm in AC, and 7 μm close to the margin of the wear facets in glazed EC after 5K cycles. The EC showed no cracks with increasing wear cycles. Seventy‐μm deep subsurface cracks were detected in SSL and 45 μm in AC after 80K cycles. Statistically, there was significant difference among the three materials ( p < 0.05). Bonferroni multiple comparison of means test confirmed the ANOVA test and showed that there was no statistical difference ( p > 0.05) in crack depth within the same ceramic material with different surface finishes. Conclusions: The ceramic materials with different microstructures showed different patterns of subsurface cracking.