z-logo
Premium
Effect of Dysphasia and Dysphagia on Inpatient Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay: A Database Study
Author(s) -
Guyomard Veronique,
Fulcher Robert A.,
Redmayne Oliver,
Metcalf Anthony K.,
Potter John F.,
Myint Phyo K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02526.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dysphagia , medline , dementia , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , pediatrics , gerontology , surgery , disease , political science , law
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of dysphasia and dysphagia on stroke outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: Norfolk, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand nine hundred eighty‐three men and women with stroke admitted to the hospital between 1997 and 2001. MEASUREMENTS: Inpatient mortality and likelihood of longer length of hospital stay, defined as longer than median length of stay (LOS). Dysphagia was defined as difficulty swallowing any liquid (including saliva) or solid material. Dysphasia was defined as speech disorders in which there was impairment of the power of expression by speech, writing, or signs or impairment of the power of comprehension of spoken or written language. An experienced team assessed dysphagia and dysphasia using explicit criteria. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred eighty‐three patients (1,330 (44.6%) male), median age 78 (range 17–105), were included, of whom 77.7% had ischemic, 10.5% had hemorrhagic, and 11.8% had undetermined stroke types. Dysphasia was present in 41.2% (1,230) and dysphagia in 50.5% (1,506), and 27.7% (827) had both conditions. Having either or both conditions was associated with greater mortality and longer LOS ( P <.001 for all). Using multiple logistic regression models controlling for age, sex, premorbid Rankin score, previous disabling stroke, and stroke type, corresponding odds ratios for death and longer LOS were 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.8–2.7) and 1.4 (95% CI=1.2–1.6) for dysphasia; 12.5 (95% CI=8.9–17.3) and 3.9 (95% CI=3.3–4.6) for dysphagia, 5.5 (95% CI=3.7–8.2), 1.9 (95% CI=1.6–2.3) for either, and 13.8 (95% CI=9.4–20.4) and 3.7 (95% CI=3.1–4.6) if they had both, versus having no dysphasia, no dysphagia, or none of these conditions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with dysphagia have worse outcome in terms of inpatient mortality and length of hospital stay than those with dysphasia. When both conditions are present, the presence of dysphagia appears to determine the likelihood of poor outcome. Whether this effect is related just to stroke severity or results from problems related directly to dysphagia is unclear.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom