Premium
Change in the post‐discharge destinations from a senile dementia therapy ward in Japan: the second report
Author(s) -
NAKAGAWA Yasushi,
TSURUTA Ryunosuke,
SAKURAI Osamu,
MIYAZAKI Miho,
TSUKAMOTO Shinobu,
NAKAGAWA Chiyuki,
HARANO Mutsuo,
YUZURIHA Takefumi,
MONJI Akira,
YAMASHITA Norifumi,
NOHTOMI Akito
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
psychogeriatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.647
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1479-8301
pISSN - 1346-3500
DOI - 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2005.00081.x
Subject(s) - dementia , medicine , gerontology , senile dementia , destinations , nursing homes , hospital discharge , pediatrics , emergency medicine , general surgery , disease , nursing , geography , tourism , archaeology
Abstract Background: The new long‐term care insurance (LTCI) system, known as Kaigo‐Hoken , was implemented in April 2000. We previously reported a change in the type of destination after discharge from a senile dementia therapy ward (named the Midori ward) following implementation of the LTCI system at Fukuoka Prefectural Onga Hospital during the period from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2001 in Psychogeriatrics (2003; 3 : 104–108). We subsequently investigated the type of destination after discharge from the Midori ward at Fukuoka Prefectural Onga Hospital during the period from 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002. Methods: We used data from a total of 320 discharged inpatients with dementia who fulfilled the criteria according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , fourth edition (DSM‐IV) for dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia and other types of dementia. We compared the period from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 before the LTCI implementation and the periods from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2001 and 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002 after the LTCI implementation. The type of destination after discharge and the place of origin of the inpatients before admission were classified into one of the following groups: (i) nursing home or geriatric care facility group; (ii) hospitalization group; (iii) home group; and (iv) death group. Results: No significant change was evident when the subjects’ post‐discharge destinations were compared or when the subjects’ pre‐admission residences and post‐discharge destinations were compared. These results were similar to our previous report which appeared in Psychogeriatrics (2003; 3 : 104–108). Conclusion: While the LTCI system has become more widely used, it is still necessary to analyze each case and provide the care that encourages people with dementia in senile dementia therapy wards to return to their homes under the LTCI system.