z-logo
Premium
Culture Change in Three Taxation Administrations: From Command‐and‐Control to Responsive Regulation
Author(s) -
JOB JENNY,
STOUT ANDREW,
SMITH RACHAEL
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9930
pISSN - 0265-8240
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00247.x
Subject(s) - argument (complex analysis) , administration (probate law) , tax law , style (visual arts) , control (management) , revenue , work (physics) , command and control , process (computing) , organizational culture , law and economics , tax policy , tax administration , law , public administration , business , political science , public relations , economics , management , accounting , tax reform , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , telecommunications , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology , history , operating system
Law and policy is one thing, but their implementation and administration is affected by organizational cultures. Meidinger has argued that knowledge of regulatory and organizational cultures assists understanding of how law and policy work in practice. This article examines three revenue administrations that are moving from a command‐and‐control style of regulation to a more persuasive and responsive style of regulation. The central argument is that there is a determining step in the process of clarification, reconciliation, responsiveness, and design of a tax system. That step is the extent to which organizational culture can be changed to embrace inclusive discussion and creative solutions to the administration of tax law and policy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom