Premium
Efficacy and safety of pregabalin for treating neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a 14 week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Author(s) -
Satoh J.,
Yagihashi S.,
Baba M.,
Suzuki M.,
Arakawa A.,
Yoshiyama T.,
Shoji S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
diabetic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.474
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1464-5491
pISSN - 0742-3071
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03152.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pregabalin , peripheral neuropathy , randomized controlled trial , placebo , neuropathic pain , diabetic neuropathy , double blind , anesthesia , placebo controlled study , peripheral , diabetes mellitus , surgery , alternative medicine , endocrinology , pathology
Diabet. Med. 28, 109–116 (2011) Abstract Aims To evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in treating neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Japanese patients. Methods A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre 14 week clinical trial was conducted. Japanese patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy ( n = 317) were randomized to receive placebo or pregabalin at 300 or 600 mg/day. The primary efficacy measure was a change of mean pain score from baseline to end‐point from patients’ daily pain diaries. Results Significant reductions in pain were observed in patients treated with pregabalin at 300 and 600 mg/day vs. placebo ( P < 0.05). Improvements in weekly pain scores were observed as early as week 1 and were sustained throughout the study period (300 and 600 mg/day difference from placebo at study end‐point, –0.63 and –0.74, respectively). Pregabalin produced significant improvements in weekly sleep interference scores, the short‐form McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes Study–Sleep Scale, the 36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey scale, and the Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change. Patient impressions of numbness, pain and paraesthesia were also significantly improved. Regarding treatment responders, 29.1 and 35.6% of patients treated with 300 and 600 mg/day, respectively, reported ≥50% improvement in mean pain scores (vs. 21.5% for placebo). Pregabalin was well tolerated; somnolence (26%), dizziness (24%), peripheral oedema (13%) and weight gain (11%) were the most common adverse events and generally were reported as mild to moderate. Conclusions Pregabalin was effective in reducing pain and improving sleep disturbances due to pain, and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with painful DPN.