Premium
Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and sirolimus after gastric bypass surgery in end‐stage renal disease and transplant patients: a pilot study
Author(s) -
Rogers Christin C,
Alloway Rita R,
Alexander J. Wesley,
Cardi Michael,
Trofe Jennifer,
Vinks Alexander A
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00783.x
Subject(s) - medicine , mycophenolic acid , tacrolimus , sirolimus , dialysis , urology , population , immunosuppression , pharmacokinetics , transplantation , gastroenterology , pharmacology , surgery , environmental health
Abstract: Background: Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population. Methods: Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial – four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis‐dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4‐mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000‐mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24‐h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration ( C max ), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration ( T max ) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC 0–12 and AUC 0–∞ where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). Results: Significant inter‐patient variability in the C max , T max and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non‐bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG. Conclusions: When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non‐bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non‐bypass patient.