Premium
Basophil histamine release in the diagnosis of house dust mite and dander allergy of asthmatic children
Author(s) -
ØStergaard P. A.,
Ebbesen F.,
Nolte H.,
Skov P. Stahl
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.363
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1398-9995
pISSN - 0105-4538
DOI - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00488.x
Subject(s) - provocation test , histamine , medicine , asthma , allergy , allergen , radioallergosorbent test , house dust mite , basophil , immunology , nasal provocation test , immunoglobulin e , pathology , antibody , alternative medicine
The aim of the study is to compare the glass fibre‐based basophil histamine release test with skin test (Phazet®), RAST (Phadebas®) and bronchial provocation test in children with allergic asthma. The study comprised 68 selected children with a case history of extrinsic allergic asthma to danders (cat and dog) and house‐dust mite. Skin prick test, RAST, and histamine release were performed in all children and the bronchial provocation test was used as a reference of “true allergic asthma”. A total of 81 allergen bronchial challenges were performed and 44 children experienced 49 positive provocations. In 2.9% (2/68) of the children histamine release could not be performed due to technical difficulties (low histamine release with anti‐IgE). Concordances in the range 76–87 % were observed with no significant difference between the tests. The highest concordance (87%) was found between histamine release and bronchial provocation test followed by skin prick test vs bronchial provocation (84 %) and RAST vs bronchial provocation (80%). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test. All tests showed sensitivities in the range 90–94 % and no significant difference between them was observed. The specificity of histamine release, skin prick test, and RAST was 0.78, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively. The specificity of histamine release was better than RAST demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals. In conclusion, it was found that the histamine release test is a convenient diagnostic method and the study indicates a diagnostic value comparable to the common diagnostic methods in clinical allergy.