z-logo
Premium
Comparison between two modified methods of neutral‐detergent fibre analysis
Author(s) -
Gustavsson A.M.,
Martinsson K.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00416.x
Subject(s) - red clover , forage , phleum , mathematics , zoology , significant difference , chemistry , agronomy , biology , statistics
When describing the methods of analysis of neutral‐detergent fibre (NDF) it is valuable to know if different modifications of the standard method of analysis give the same absolute results or if the analysing method has to be specified. In this study two modifications of the standard method were compared, a 16‐h oven technique and a filter‐bag technique. The comparisons were conducted using thirty‐two timothy ( Phleum pratense L.) and thirty‐two red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) samples. The study showed that both methods ranked the forage samples in the same relative order and had good accuracy. However, the NDF concentrations for the filter‐bag system were on average 7·8 g kg −1 DM higher for the red clover samples and 39·7 g kg −1 DM higher for the timothy samples. The difference in concentration of NDF for the red clover samples was smaller than the field variation and the daily change in NDF concentration, but in timothy the difference was four to five times larger than the field variation and the mean daily changes in NDF concentration. The study shows that it is important to specify the method of analysis for NDF when analysing timothy samples but not red clover samples, and that for this dataset it was possible to use a correction constant to recalculate the results from one method to the other.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here