z-logo
Premium
The influence of nitrous oxide on propofol dosage and recovery after total intravenous anaesthesia for day‐case surgery
Author(s) -
LINDEKÆR A. L.,
SKIELBOE M.,
GULDAGER H.,
JENSEN E. W.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05991.x
Subject(s) - medicine , nitrous oxide , propofol , anesthesia , target controlled infusion , remifentanil
Summary We studied the influence of nitrous oxide on the maintenence dose of propofol and recovery characteristics in 42 patients, aged 18–62 years, ASA 1 or 2, scheduled for day case inguinal herniotomy. Using a double‐blind, randomised design, patients received anaesthesia with propofol‐alfentanil‐vecuronium‐oxygen and either nitrous oxide or room air (Fio 2 = 0.30). The rate of propofol infusion was adjusted depending on anaesthetic depth as judged using standard clinical criteria; alfentanil was administered on a weight basis. Patients’ lungs were manually ventilated after tracheal intubation and muscle relaxation was reversed at the end of surgery with neostigmine and atropine. A series of psychomotor tests was performed pre‐operatively and 30 and 120min postoperatively. The mean maintenance doses of propofol were 0.084 mg .kg ‐1 .min ‐1 in the N 2 O group and 0.088 mg.kg ‐1 .min ‐1 in the air group (p = 0.97). In the nitrous oxide group the mean (SD) interval to spontaneous eye opening was 13.1 (7.3) min compared to 8.1 (4.9)min in the air group (p = 0.01). Similarly, the interval until obtaining a standardised response was 13.5 (5.3) min and 9.8min (5.4) in the nitrous oxide and air groups, respectively (p = 0.04). The addition of nitrous oxide to propofol‐alfentanil‐vecuronium anaesthesia does not reduce propofol requirements and prolongs early recovery compared to air.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here