Premium
RESPONSIBILITY AND THE AIMS OF THEORY: STRAWSON AND REVISIONISM
Author(s) -
VARGAS MANUEL
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
pacific philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1468-0114
pISSN - 0279-0750
DOI - 10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00195.x
Subject(s) - determinism , incompatibilism , compatibilism , epistemology , free will , dialectic , moral responsibility , philosophy , face (sociological concept) , point (geometry) , mathematics , linguistics , geometry
Abstract: Strawsonian approaches to responsibility, including more recent accounts such as Dennett's and Wallace’s, face a number of important objections. However, Strawsonian theories can be recast along revisionist lines so as to avoid many of these problems. In this paper, I explain the revisionist approach to moral responsibility, discuss the concessions it makes to incompatibilism (including the point that compatibilists may not fully capture what our commonsense understanding of responsibility), why it provides a fruitful recasting of Strawsonian approaches, and how it offers an alternative to the pattern of dialectical stalemates exhibited by standard approaches to free will and determinism.