Premium
Against Supermax
Author(s) -
Lippke Richard L.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of applied philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.339
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1468-5930
pISSN - 0264-3758
DOI - 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00267.x
Subject(s) - punishment (psychology) , prison , criminology , retributive justice , action (physics) , solitary confinement , subject (documents) , consciousness , psychology , political science , law , sociology , epistemology , law and economics , social psychology , philosophy , economic justice , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , library science
abstract Supermax prisons subject inmates to extreme isolation and sensory deprivation for extended periods of time. Crime reduction and retributive arguments in favour of supermax confinement are elaborated. Both types of arguments are shown to falter once the logic of the two approaches to the justification of legal punishment is made clear and evidence about the effects of supermax confinement on inmates is considered. It is also argued that many criminal offenders suffer from defects in their capacities for morally responsible action, lack sufficient opportunities to remain law‐abiding, or are understandably alienated from society and the prison regime. The implications of this more realistic picture of offenders for supermax confinement are then explored briefly.