z-logo
Premium
Cost comparison of five Australasian obesity prevention interventions for children aged from birth to two years
Author(s) -
Brown Vicki,
Tan Eng J.,
Hayes Alison,
Baur Louise,
Campbell Karen,
Taylor Rachael,
Byrne Rebecca,
Wen Li Ming,
Hesketh Kylie D.,
Moodie Marjory
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pediatric obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.226
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 2047-6310
pISSN - 2047-6302
DOI - 10.1111/ijpo.12684
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , medicine , activity based costing , intervention (counseling) , cost effectiveness , cost–benefit analysis , childhood obesity , comparability , health economics , obesity , public health , nursing , risk analysis (engineering) , overweight , accounting , ecology , mathematics , combinatorics , business , biology
Summary Background In the absence of rigorous evidence of cost‐effectiveness for early childhood obesity prevention interventions, the next‐best option may be for decision‐makers to consider the relevant costs of interventions when allocating resources. Objectives This study aimed to estimate systematically the cost of five obesity prevention interventions in children aged 0‐2 years, undertaken in research settings in Australia and New Zealand. Methods A standardised costing protocol informed the costing methodology, ensuring comparability of results across interventions. Micro‐costing was undertaken, with intervention costs defined from the funder perspective and valued in 2018 Australian dollars using unit costs from the trials or market rates. Results Interventions varied widely in their resource use. The total cost per participant ranged from $80 for the CHAT SMS intervention arm (95% UI $77‐$82) to $1135 for the Healthy Beginnings intervention (95% UI $1059‐$1189). Time costs of personnel delivering interventions contributed >50% of total intervention costs for all included studies. Conclusions An understanding of the costs associated with intervention delivery modes is important, alongside effectiveness. Telephone delivery may include unexpected costs associated with connection to intervention participants at convenient times. A SMS‐based intervention had the lowest delivery cost in this study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom