z-logo
Premium
Eosinophilic infiltration: an under‐reported histological finding in urticarial vasculitis
Author(s) -
Kamyab Kambiz,
Ghodsi Seyedeh Zahra,
Ghanadan Alireza,
Taghizadeh Jafar,
Karimi Shiva,
Nasimi Maryam
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-4632
pISSN - 0011-9059
DOI - 10.1111/ijd.14387
Subject(s) - medicine , pathology , infiltration (hvac) , eosinophil , extravasation , eosinophilic , cellular infiltration , vasculitis , edema , inflammation , immunology , disease , physics , asthma , thermodynamics
Abstract Background Urticarial vasculitis ( UV ) is a clinicopathologic entity in which skin lesions resemble urticaria clinically but last more than 24 hours and resolve with residual purpura. In this study, we evaluated distinguishing histological features of UV from common urticaria to differentiate between these two entities. Methods During 1 year, 55 urticaria and 245 UV samples were assessed. The selection criteria for UV included: (1) samples that the histological diagnosis was confirmed by two independent dermatopathologists, (2) the histological diagnosis of UV was inconsistent with the first clinical impression and lesion characteristics. Results Of our 245 UV patients, 96% had endothelial swelling, 18% had red blood cell (RBC) extravasation, neutrophilic infiltration was seen in 46.7%, and perivascular, interstitial, and perineural eosinophilic infiltration in 198 (81.8%), 181 (74.2%), and 118 (48.1%), respectively. Among different histological findings, endothelial cell swelling as well as neutrophil around vessels and eosinophilic infiltrations were statistically different between two groups ( P ‐value ˂ 0.001). Both urticaria and UV samples showed a predominantly lymphocytic infiltration more than 10 cells per high power field (HPF) (98.2% of urticaria, 98.8% of UV ), and only two patients (0.8%) with UV had predominant neutrophilic infiltration (more than 10 cells/ HPF ). Conclusion We have found that both urticaria and UV showed a predominantly lymphocytic infiltration along with RBC extravasation, endothelial cell swelling, and fibrin deposition in UV . Moreover, significant perineural, perivascular, and interstitial infiltration of eosinophil in UV lesions compared to urticaria was another point that indicates special contribution of these cells in UV pathogenesis.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here