z-logo
Premium
Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South‐West Trains
Author(s) -
Bamforth Nicholas
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the modern law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1468-2230
pISSN - 0026-7961
DOI - 10.1111/1468-2230.00287
Subject(s) - sexual orientation , scope (computer science) , law , political science , constitutional court , economic justice , human rights , train , orientation (vector space) , court decision , law and economics , sociology , history , computer science , mathematics , gender studies , geometry , archaeology , programming language , constitution
In Grant v South‐West Trains [1998] ECR I‐621, the European Court of Justice implied that, as a general matter, discrimination against an employee on the ground of sexual orientation did not violate Article 141 EC. This article argues that Grant rests on shaky foundations, in that it is conceptually inconsistent with the Court’s earlier decision in P v S and Cornwall County Council [1996] ECR I‐2143. Furthermore, the scope of Grant has since been qualified by decisions of the European Court of Human Rights – decisions which may well have undermined the status of the case more broadly. However these difficulties are ultimately resolved, the Court of Justice’s treatment of sexual orientation discrimination exposes flaws in its approach as a self‐proclaimed constitutional court.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom