A comparison of the different methods available for determining BCG‐macrophage interactions in vitro, including a new method of colony counting in broth
Author(s) -
Fazal N.,
Bartlett R.,
Lammas D.A.,
Kumararatne D.S.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
fems microbiology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1574-6968
pISSN - 0378-1097
DOI - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb05921.x
Subject(s) - colony forming unit , uridine , macrophage , agar , enumeration , labelling , in vitro , glycerol , isotope dilution , microbiology and biotechnology , cell counting , monocyte , biology , uracil , chromatography , chemistry , biochemistry , bacteria , immunology , cell , mass spectrometry , rna , mathematics , cell cycle , dna , genetics , combinatorics , gene
Different methods of determining BCG viability based on colony forming unit (CFU) counting and radio‐isotope labelling were comparatively assessed. These included radio‐isotope labelling with [ 3 H]uracil, [ 3 H]uridine, [ 3 H]glycerol, and CFU counting, by both agar plate dilution, and microcolony counting in broth. The sensitivity ranges of the different techniques were determined in both macrophage‐free and macrophage‐treated systems and used to assess the anti‐mycobacterial potential of human monocyte‐derived macrophages following BCG infection.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom