Comparison of Q-value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

Background: Previous studies examining the safety and efficacy of Q -value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for treating myopia have yielded inconsistent results. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to clarify this issue Methods: Various databases were conducted up to November 21, 2018. All randomized controlled trials and cohorts that compared Q -value-guided LASIK with standard LASIK were selected. Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlations. Additionally, different subgroup analyses and publication bias tests were performed. Data were extracted including the number of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, postoperative UCVA, preoperative and postoperative Q -value, postoperative refractive spherical equivalent (SE), the number of postoperative SE within ±0.5D, higher order aberration (HOA), coma-like aberration and spherical-like aberration. Results: A total of seventeen studies with 2640 patients and 3,358 eyes were included. It has been shown that postoperative Q -value (MD = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.64, -0.21; P  < .001), HOA (MD = -0.14; 95% CI: -0.23, -0.06; P  = .001), spherical-like aberration (MD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.06; P  = .004) rather than postoperative UCVA (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.07; P  = .012) were significantly better in the Q -value-guided LASIK than standard LASIK. However, the pooled results revealed that no significant differences were found between the 2 paired groups of postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.92; P  = .763), preoperative Q -value (MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.02; P  = .922), postoperative refractive SE (MD = 0.08; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.25; P  = .336), coma-like aberration (horizontal: MD = -0.00; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.03; P  = .966; vertical: MD = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.01; P  = .263) and postoperative SE within ±0.5 D (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.48, 2.33; P  = .886). Likewise, similar results were detected in some corresponding subgroups. Conclusion: Q -value-guided LASIK is a safe, effective and predictable surgical option for treating myopia, especially showing superiority over standard LASIK in postoperative Q -value, HOA and spherical-like aberration. However, more detailed studies are required to confirm our conclusions in advanced researches.