Abstract P9. Patient-Physician Disparity in Breast Reconstruction Aesthetic Outcomes: Chasing the Elusive “Great” Result
Author(s) -
Eliana F. R. Duraes,
Stephanie Kortyka,
Leonardo C. Duraes,
Megan V. Morisada,
Susan Orra,
João Batista de Sousa,
Risal Djohan,
Steven Bernard,
Andréa Moreira,
Graham S. Schwarz
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
plastic and reconstructive surgery global open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.759
H-Index - 28
ISSN - 2169-7574
DOI - 10.1097/01.gox.0000513383.20660.f7
Subject(s) - breast reconstruction , medicine , psychosocial , demographics , implant , patient satisfaction , depression (economics) , quality of life (healthcare) , surgery , breast cancer , demography , psychiatry , nursing , cancer , sociology , economics , macroeconomics
METHODS: Patients with completed breast reconstructions of all types from 2009–2011 completed BreastQ questionnaires. Postoperative photos were graded by a six member panel using a breast reconstruction-specific aesthetic scale. Scores from the BreastQ domain “satisfaction with breasts” (BrSat) were compared with the photo-based grades (PhotoGr). Patients were categorized: Group 1, BrSat >PhotoGr; Group 2, BrSat =PhotoGr; Group 3 patients BrSat
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom