z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Are free workplace health promotion apps adequately mapped with behavior change theories, techniques and desired features? A content analysis
Author(s) -
Baskaran Chandrasekaran,
Poornima Panduranga Kundapur,
Chythra R Rao
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
translational behavioral medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1869-6716
pISSN - 1613-9860
DOI - 10.1093/tbm/ibab042
Subject(s) - behavior change methods , physical activity , health psychology , behavior change , promotion (chess) , behaviour change , applied psychology , psychology , social media , smartphone application , internet privacy , computer science , world wide web , multimedia , social psychology , medicine , public health , physical therapy , psychological intervention , law , politics , psychiatry , political science , nursing
Free smartphone applications that aim to promote physical activity or reduce sedentary behavior at workplaces were questioned for its content such as technical features, behavior change techniques (BCT) and security concerns. To evaluate systematically whether smartphone apps are mapped adequately with BCTs and security concerns. Free apps in Google Play store were searched and coded for BCTs systematically in July 2020. Two reviewers independently coded apps that aimed to promote physical activity (n = 18) and reduce sedentary behavior (n = 16) using a taxonomy of 26 BCTs. BCTs, features and security concerns among apps promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior were analyzed. While the features (social support, gamification, or rewards) help increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behavior, the apps do not typically include the above features. Further, the apps were based on an average of 13 (4–21) BCTs. The BCTs coded most frequently were “self-monitoring” (100%), “general encouragement” (97%), and “goal setting” (n = 94%). No significant relation between user rating and BCTs was found in the apps. Majority of the free apps that aimed to increase physical activity or reduce sedentary behavior at workplaces were not adequately based on BCTs and lacked essential features facilitating long term behavior compliance at workplaces. Hence, there is a need to develop newer applications mapped adequately with BCTs, involving the collaborative work of behavioral scientists, app developers and policymakers. Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2020/03/024138.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom